UK Curriculum Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

UK Curriculum - Essay ExampleThese categories have helped to shape the put forward curriculum today. Old aright advocates held the first perspective during that time. They asserted that the purpose of gentility is to divide students into a group of selecteds and underclass. Education was supposed to teach the underclass how to become submissive to the upper class. On the contrary, the elite were the rulers of land. They were supposed to acquire some managerial and social skills necessary for leadership. Additionally, the two groups had distinct cultures that separated them from ane another.According to this perspective, the curriculum should focus on tralatitious subjects, which are to be examined regularly. However, the sort of implementation would disaccord according to student type. The elite were supposed to be taught in separated environments in an efficient manner while the underclass was to receive mediocre knowledge. One should note that some members of the civil serv ice and traditionalists predominate this belief.Education experts also hold another view with regard to the purpose of commandment. They debate that education should be tailored to collaborate the needs of the population. Consequently, a country give be able to sustain itself if their students meet this objective. Such an approach may not necessarily be compatible with traditional values and may require adjustments. This is because the economy is constantly fluctuating. In instances where in that respect is a decline, then there should be great flexibility to meet present needs.The implication of such an approach on the present curriculum is a focus on science and technology. Besides this, a curriculum needs to practical in genius hence the need for vocational training. Furthermore, students should not learn independently in schools there should be a link between the school environment and the corporate world. Consequently, the curriculum should accommodate greater levels of internships and attachments. (Ross, 2000)Neo conservatives believe that the purpose of education is to inculcate traditional beliefs that had held society close over the years. Such adherents propose that education today has been plagued by diversity and fragmentation. Consequently, there is a need to bring back these values to the education system in order to stabilize it. The implication for the curriculum in this regard is the pursuance of traditional subjects with emphasis on the grammar school subjects. Such a curriculum is highly conservative in that there is little room for discussion on the kind of content taught. In addition, the public should not critically analyze such a curriculum. Margaret Thatcher was a known proponent and so were some new right conservatives in parliament.Neo liberal proponents believe that the purpose of education is to provide individuals with a means of live up to their needs just the same way that other commodities in the market do. In this re gard, education bathroom be treated as a good in the market place the more value it possesses, the higher the demand. Proponents of this view strongly adhere to the belief that education has a price and that the market will determine this price. By treating education like this, adherents to this principle believe that they can establish higher levels of military operation because schools will promoted to perform well in order to sustain competition. Consequently,